![]() Did the film have several different titles (a primary and an alternate, in most cases)? Can you explain why this is the case? In other words, why does the article currently sit at this title rather than the other? If it is, should the article make a note of it? A footnote to explain the use of both titles would work and is generally best practice if a film uses multiple titles. Kailash29792 ( talk) 07:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I'm still trying to figure this out. Ssven2 speak 2 me 06:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I think this is already fine as it is, because 23m redirects to this article now, and anything linking to that actually links to this. But, both are correct and signify the same translation ie meaning. Many newspapers named the films as either one of the two versions. Surely, these should be fixed if this is the correct title? Why are there two different titles? Viriditas ( talk) 05:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Any idea why there were two different versions for so many years? There are still quite a number of articles that link to the duplicate (but alternately named topic). The page histories indicate that until recently, two duplicate articles on this subject existed, the current version Imsai Arasan 23am Pulikesi (created ) and Imsai Arasan 23m Pulikesi (created 21 July 2006).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |